Comparison of Six Video Analysis Systems
	Our System	iPad	iPhone	Camcorder	Camera	Camcorder, Laptop, Software
Viewability in bright, sunny conditions	High	Poor	Poor	Fair	Fair	Fair
Suitability for immediate playback in the field	High	Poor (2)	Fair (1)	Fair (1)	Fair (1)	High
Camera rate (i.e. frames captured per second)	60	30	30	30-60	30-200+	30-200+
Supports add-on camera's of 200 fps and higher	Yes	No	No	N/A	N/A	N/A
Camera distortion (i.e. blurry frames due to fast motion)	Minimal	High	High	Minimal	Minimal	Minimal
On-screen software controls	Yes	Yes	Yes (1)	No	Yes (1)	Yes
Touch-screen operated	Yes	Yes	Yes	Sometimes	Sometimes	No
Usage by multiple people at once	High	Poor (2)	Poor (1)	Poor (1)	Poor (1)	High
Weather resistant (rain, in particular)	Good	Poor	Fair	Fair	Fair	Poor
Battery life	8 hrs	6+ Hrs.	3+ Hrs.	4+ Hrs.	4+ Hrs.	6+ Hrs.
Software features (i.e. compare side-by-side, draw tools, etc.)	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes
Ease of setup	High	High	High	High	High	Fair
Ease of use	High	High	High	High	High	Fair to Poor
Camera distance (i.e. distance from camera to subject)	5'	15'	15'	15'	10'	15'
Sound quality (outdoors and in noisy areas)	High	Poor	Poor	Poor	Poor	Fair
Wind Stability	High	Poor	Poor	Poor	Poor	Variable
Other important usage issues	None	Inconvenient to use because of integrated camera (4)				Several (5)
Cost (including tripods, batteries, memory, etc.)	2,895	550	300	400	300	4000+ (3)
(1) Can be hard to read due to small size (2) Screen is hard to read outdoors (3) Includes sun-viewable laptop (4) Camera must be continually placed for recording, then picked up to view videos, then replaced to capture the next video (5) Requires mouse and keyboard; must use an expensive laptop to be highly viewable outdoors